Blake Lively & Ryan Reynolds’ WGA Scabbing and PGA Violations: Court Documents Reveal Mᴀssive Cover-Up
The controversy centers on Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds’ involvement in the production of It Ends With Us and its sequel It Starts With Us.
Court records reveal a calculated campaign to seize control of the film from original writer-director Justin Baldoni.
Blake Lively allegedly pushed extensive script changes, reshaping the character of Lily into a version more reflective of herself, while Ryan Reynolds added scenes that painted the character negatively.
This creative takeover sparked tensions on set and led to accusations of manipulation and coercion.
Despite Blake’s public claims to the Producers Guild that she honored the WGA strike and supported union members, private communications tell a different story.
Text messages show Blake coordinating with cast members, including WGA member Jenny Slate, to continue writing and revising scripts during the strike—actions that consтιтute scabbing.
Blake ᴀssured producers and crew that no picket lines were crossed, yet evidence points to active work being done behind the scenes.
A key moment arose when Justin Baldoni secretly recorded a Zoom session with Blake and Jenny Slate where they discussed script revisions.
Jenny Slate, a WGA member, was caught scabbing, which put her in a precarious position within the union.
Soon after, grievances against Justin emerged, many believed to be fabricated or exaggerated as part of a smear campaign orchestrated by Blake and her team to undermine Justin’s credibility and consolidate control.
Publicists working for Blake actively seeded negative stories about Justin Baldoni to media outlets, attempting to balance or overshadow criticism aimed at Blake and Ryan.
Internal communications reveal a deliberate effort to spin narratives portraying Justin as difficult and unprofessional, while protecting Blake’s reputation and her PGA producer credit.
The PGA credit itself is under scrutiny.
Blake reportedly obtained producer credit through questionable means, including coercing others to write supportive letters under duress.
Such actions violate the PGA’s code of conduct, which prohibits misrepresentation and undue pressure in credit attribution.
Despite this, Blake’s PGA credit remains intact, raising concerns about enforcement and accountability.
Ryan Reynolds’s role is also controversial.
As a WGA member, his involvement in writing during the strike consтιтutes scabbing.
His public revelation that he wrote certain scenes only intensified backlash, exposing the couple to accusations of violating union rules and manipulating the film’s narrative for personal gain.
The fallout has been severe.
Cast and crew divisions, public relations battles, and legal disputes have marred the production’s reputation.
Meanwhile, the original writer-director Justin Baldoni finds himself isolated, targeted by a coordinated campaign to discredit him.
This scandal highlights broader issues within Hollywood regarding union strikes, credit attribution, and the power dynamics behind the scenes.
The case reveals how high-profile actors can leverage influence to sidestep rules, manipulate narratives, and suppress dissenting voices.
As investigations continue and more documents surface, the industry watches closely.
The outcome could reshape how strikes are enforced, how producer credits are awarded, and how accountability is maintained in an environment often dominated by star power and corporate interests.
